Clarifying Grading in Case Study Group Work
Grading cooperative work in case studies can be challenging, especially when deciding how to balance group achievements with individual contributions within the case study learning. While working together helps students learn to collaborate and share responsibility, it’s important that each student feels fairly assessed for their efforts.
Clear and fair grading helps avoid frustration and confusion. It also motivates students to participate actively in the case study process. By deciding early how grades will be assigned—whether as a group, individually, or a mix of both—you set clear expectations. Curious to see how this works in practice? Click on the video below for helpful strategies and examples.
Personal reflection
What are three common ways to assign grades during group case study work?
You can grade only the group result, only individual contributions, or use a mix of both. A mixed method often feels fairest because it recognises both teamwork and personal effort.
Why is it important to clarify grading expectations in case-based learning?
Clear expectations help students understand how their work will be assessed. This reduces confusion and makes them more motivated to contribute fairly to the group.
How does peer review help with grading in cooperative case studies?
Peer review allows students to give feedback on each other’s efforts. This helps teachers understand how the work was divided and encourages all team members to take responsibility.